Monday, February 18, 2013

Oscar 2013 Predictions

One week from today will mark the 85th Academy Awards and it'll be another year to remember. The Oscars are a time to look back on all the movies from the past year and celebrate them all! Like every year, I make my predictions in several of the major categories.

Best Supporting Actor
Should win: Christoph Waltz or Robert DeNiro
Will win: Waltz

Christoph Waltz plays every role he is in perfectly and his role as Dr. King Schultz is no different. Making an enjoyable character really fun to watch on screen and help tell the story. It was great to see Robert DeNiro playing a more powerful role than his other recent roles. Proving he still has his acting chops about him. It'd be great to see him win. And finally there's Tommy Lee Jones, who worked well in Lincoln and showed audiences how difficult compromising politically was in those times, but I don't think this is his year.

Best Supporting Actress
Should and will win (without question): Anne Hathaway

Using the live singing to its fullest, she nearly steals the entire movie with her brief time on screen. Showing anguish, pain, and a little bit of hope, Hathaway as Fantine blew this role out of the water and showed that she can get serious when she's not flirting with death as Selina Kyle in The Dark Knight Rises.

Best Screenplay
Should win: Django Unchained
Will win: Django Unchained

Possibly one of Quentin Tarantino's best scripts, I think it will take home the Oscar for best screenplay this year. With creative dialogue he sets up his gruesome violence, which he's known for, and makes you laugh when the violence is directed at slave owners/drivers. Only screenplay that might beat this out is Wes Anderson's Moonrise Kingdom. His story of young love holds true to his quirky style of humor and show an odd take on the first love of two young children.

Best Adapted Screenplay:
Should win: Lincoln or Silver Linings Playbook
Will win: Argo

Having not read any of the things these stories are based on, I am looking at them solely based on the translation to the screen. Nothing can stop the Academy and every other award show giving the award to Argo, probably to make up for the fact that Affleck wasn't nominated for best director. That's why it'll win this award. It's not the best movie of the year. The most deserving of this award is Silver Linings Playbook. I didn't know it would be such an enjoyable film. Every twist and line of dialogue combined with the various extreme characters, made this a ton of fun to watch from beginning to end. Lincoln on the other hand is equally as good as Playbook, but much more dramatic and slow-paced. The part of Lincoln is seemingly written directly for Daniel Day-Lewis, much like his last award winning role as Daniel Plainview in There Will Be Blood.


Best Director:
Should win: David O. Russell
Will win: Steven Spielberg

With Affleck getting snubbed for this category, it could very feasibly fall into the hands of Steven Spielberg, again. Spielberg is a master of storytelling and he deserves this nomination as much as anyone. However, I'd like to see a comedic director win and Sliver Linings Playbook is just the movie that could do it.

Best Actress:
Should and will win: Jennifer Lawrence

Many critics claim that Jessica Chastain's performance in Zero Dark Thirty is the best female performance of the year, but that is simply not true. Jennifer Lawrence is more passionate and embraces her character's crazy side. She plays Tiffany, a recent widow, dealing with her new found intimacy issues. At the most pivotal moment she proves that she cares about Pat (Bradley Cooper) and does what Pat can't: stand up to his father Pat Sr. (Robert DeNiro). She sells this moment of genius absolutely perfectly. Lawrence fulfills what it means to be a best actress, whereas Jessica Chastain has very brief explosions of emotion that generally do nothing for the character.

Best Actor:
Should and will win: Daniel Day-Lewis

The Academy can make history this year. If Daniel Day-Lewis he will become the first actor to win this award three times. Only Walter Brennan (three times for best supporting actor) and Jack Nicholson (two for lead actor, one for supporting actor) have won three acting Oscars. Who is more deserving of this honor than Daniel Day-Lewis. A character actor who always finds a way to embody his character, whether it is a writer/painter who can only move his left foot (My Left Foot 1989), a gang leading butcher (Gangs of New York, 2002), or his most recent best actor win as a greedy oil prospector (There Will Be Blood, 2007). His acting can't be beat. And this year is no different. On screen there is no actor, no Daniel Day-Lewis. There is only Abraham Lincoln. He and Sally Field reportedly would text each other only in 1850s language to never be out of character. 

The only performance I could see beating him out would be Bradley Cooper, but that's probably only because I enjoyed Silver Linings Playbook immensely.

Best Picture:

Who will walk away with the biggest prize of the night? Again, critics and other award shows would have you believe that Argo is the best movie of the year, but it might only win to give Ben Affleck some redemption. However it's rare that a movie wins best picture without being nominated in the directing category. But Hollywood loves nothing more than a movie revolving around the production of movies (Last year's The Artist, proved that). While I do agree that Argo is good, it just didn't hit everything I feel a best picture should. There were very few characters I related to, believed, or cared about.

Amour, Life of Pi, and Les Misérables will all fall short due to the nature of the awards. Amour shouldn't win because it will handily take the best foreign film award. Life of Pi ends too ambiguously in my opinion, though the Academy often likes ambiguous endings. Being visually stunning isn't always enough to win. And Les Mis is fine, but it felt too much like watching a stage production, which kind of defeats the purpose of it being a movie.

Django Unchained and Beasts of the Southern Wild are the two dark horses this year. A charming performance by new comer and youngest nominee (at five years old) Quvenzhané Wallis, which carries the entire film, is endearing enough that I think it could take everyone by surprise and win the grand prize. Quentin Tarantino's films have been on the cusp of winning best picture a few times in his career. Pulp Fiction and Inglourious Basterds being the other two. Django has the acting chops, outstanding directing, and great dialogue that it could win, though the lacking best director nomination almost discounts Django from winning, much like Argo.

The final three had been the top three pictures leading into award season, but the late run by Argo winning lots of awards has changed that. Unfortunately for fans of Kathryn Bigelow's Zero Dark Thirty politics have all but killed any momentum it could have gained. Arguments over the portrayal of information-getting tactics among other things turned many voters in the Academy away. The most deserving of this award, to me, is Lincoln. Usually I'm not a fan of period dramas, but it was so expertly crafted and acted that I can't help, but hope it beats all the other movies out. Then there's Silver Linings Playbook, and if you haven't caught on, this was my favorite of the best picture nominees by far. Endearing, relatable characters, a great underdog story, and entertaining dialogue make this a movie that won't soon be forgotten.

Will win: Lincoln
Should win: Lincoln


Who I'd like to see win: Silver Linings Playbook



There you have it. Another great year of movies will soon come to a close, opening the door for the blockbusters (Iron Man 3) and new horror movies (like last year's Cabin in the Woods). But looking back there are a few movies that were completely snubbed as there are every year. The Dark Knight Rises rounding out Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy, should have received a few nominations including best picture, just based on how great the entire trilogy was. Sure the acting wasn't always the best, but Heath Ledger and Tom Hardy played two incredibly menacing villains. The Avengers, while being comic-book fanboys wet dreams, is only nominated for best visual effects and it will probably lose to Life of Pi.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Amour


Amour is a minimalistic love story about a man and his wife, who suffers from an attack, and how their love is tested. Whether it is through talking with her, feeding her, or just being with her, this is a tale of true love and the tribulations that can come with it in old age.

Foreign films often struggle in America due to the added issue of subtitles. Amour, however found a way around this. By choosing only static shots on the screen, save for a few moments when the camera follows the action, it is easier to read all the dialogue and see the character's expressions at the same time. The static shots also add a feeling of claustrophobia throughout the film.

And in a film about love and other emotions, expressions are key. Critics and audiences alike are relishing Emmanuelle Riva's performance as Anna and it is stupendously tragic, but without the outstanding performance of Jean-Louis Trintignant she would have been "hung out to dry." The chemistry the pair share on screen is unquestioningly charming.

What made their performance so great was the story and how it shows the audience the everyday struggles someone who has had a stroke must deal with. Going to the bathroom, showering, even eating. Nothing is off limits in this movie.

In the end Amour raises the question: What would you do for the person you love most?

8.5/10